top of page

Ukraine’s Survival and the Fractured West

Writer: Pandora Editorial StaffPandora Editorial Staff

As the war in Ukraine enters its third year, global diplomatic efforts to negotiate an end to the conflict have reached a crucial inflection point.

 

Recent developments—from U.S. President Donald Trump’s controversial outreach to Russian President Vladimir Putin to European leaders’ insistence on playing a central role in the peace process—have exposed deep fractures in the international response.


Paris Hosted a Trilateral Meeting Between Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Emmanuel Macron and Donald Trump on 7 December 2024.
Paris Hosted a Trilateral Meeting Between Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Emmanuel Macron and Donald Trump on 7 December 2024. (Image: President of Ukraine / Wikimedia)

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has further warned that his country has a "low chance" of survival without continued U.S. support.

 

Zelenskyy’s Warning

 

President Zelenskyy’s recent comments highlight the precarious position Ukraine finds itself in as global attention shifts toward possible diplomatic solutions. In an interview with NBC News, the Ukrainian President acknowledged that without continued U.S. military and economic support, Ukraine’s ability to resist Russian advances would be significantly weakened.

 

His concerns are further magnified by Trump’s recent suggestion that Kyiv’s NATO membership is unlikely, raising fears that Ukraine could be forced into an unfavorable settlement.

 

Zelenskyy also accused Putin of seeking a temporary ceasefire, not as a genuine step toward peace, but as a strategic pause to allow Russia to regroup and strengthen its position, as reported by Al Jazeera.

 

This aligns with the views of European leaders, particularly French President Emmanuel Macron, who has explicitly, as The Guardian outlines, warned against any "capitulation" that does not fully respect Ukraine’s sovereignty.


European leaders are set to convene an emergency summit next week to discuss the ongoing war in Ukraine, with the U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer among those attending. President Macron is believed to be leading the crisis talks, which come amid concerns over divisions between Europe and the U.S. regarding NATO’s future role.  


Speaking ahead of the summit, Starmer emphasized the need for unity, calling it a "once in a generation moment" for the U.K., U.S., and Europe to stand together against Russian aggression. "We cannot allow any divisions in the alliance to distract from the external enemies we face," he warned, as reported by CNN.  


Following the summit, Starmer will travel to Washington to meet Trump, carrying messages from European leaders. Meanwhile, the U.S. has asked European nations what security commitments they can offer Ukraine as the war continues.  


As Europe considers its next steps, U.S. National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff are reportedly heading to Saudi Arabia for a separate round of peace talks between Russia and Ukraine—talks that Europe will not be involved in. 


Zelenskyy has cautioned that Europe can no longer rely solely on America’s support, reinforcing calls for a stronger European role in NATO.        


Trump’s “Diplomacy”

 

President Trump’s recent phone call with Putin has reignited debates over the nature of U.S. foreign policy in Eastern Europe. Trump, speaking from the Oval Office, stated that he wants Russia to rejoin the Group of Seven (G7), arguing that Moscow’s exclusion a decade ago was a strategic mistake.

 

His administration has also hinted at shifting from a values-based alliance with Ukraine to an "investment relationship," as stated by U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth when speaking to reporters following a NATO defense ministerial meeting in Brussels three days ago.

 

Consequently, critics have argued that Trump’s approach risks legitimizing Russia’s invasion and undermining Ukraine’s leverage for negotiations. Additionally, European officials have also expressed concerns that the U.S. may seek a rapid resolution that prioritizes American interests—such as energy and trade deals—over Ukraine’s territorial integrity and long-term security.

 

Ukraine’s Dire Situation

 

While diplomatic negotiations unfold, the situation on the ground remains tense. Ukraine has alleged that Russian forces struck the protective shield of the Chernobyl nuclear plant, an act the Kremlin has denied but which highlights the ongoing military threat.

 

Meanwhile, Russian forces continue to occupy roughly 20% of Ukrainian territory, and with limited military aid flowing in, Ukraine’s capacity to reclaim lost ground is dwindling.

 

To compensate for this, Zelenskyy has argued that Ukraine must significantly increase its military capabilities, doubling the size of its army if NATO membership remains unattainable. However, with U.S. support appearing uncertain and European contributions seen as insufficient, the feasibility of this strategy remains in question.

 

As the Munich Security Conference highlighted, the future of Ukraine depends on how these diplomatic and military dynamics evolve. Trump’s belief that a deal with Putin can be achieved quickly has not been widely embraced by European allies or by Ukraine itself.

 

The push for a negotiated peace remains fraught with risks, particularly if it is perceived as rewarding Russian aggression.

 

Ultimately, the outcome of these negotiations will have long-lasting implications—not just for Ukraine, but for the broader global order. If Ukraine is forced into a weakened peace, it may set a precedent for authoritarian regimes using military force to achieve geopolitical aims.

 

Conversely, a prolonged conflict without a clear resolution could further destabilize the region and strain Western unity.

 

For now, Ukraine remains caught in the middle, reliant on an international community that appears increasingly divided on how to end the war.



 

Disclaimer


Any facts, views or opinions are not intended to malign and/or disrespect any religion, group, club, organisation, company, or individual.

This article published on this website is solely representative of the author. Neither the editorial staff nor the organisation (Political Pandora) are responsible for the content.


All illustrations in this piece, if any, are original works created exclusively by the Design Department of Political Pandora.


These illustrations are protected and are not available for replication, reproduction, or redistribution in any form without explicit written consent from Political Pandora. Unauthorized use, including but not limited to copying, modifying, or redistributing, is strictly prohibited.


Photographs in this particular article, if any, are taken from external sources and are not a property of Political Pandora. The use of these images are not meant for commercial purposes.


While we strive to present only reliable and accurate information, should you believe that any information present is incorrect or needs to be edited, please feel free to contact us.


 

References:



Keywords: Ukraine War, Russia Ukraine Conflict, Ukraine Crisis, NATO Ukraine, Zelenskyy Warning, Trump Putin Call, US Ukraine Policy, European Diplomacy, Russia Sanctions, NATO Expansion, Ukraine Peace Talks, US Military Aid, Ukraine Sovereignty, Russia Aggression, Global Geopolitics


Comments


Join the 
Pandora Community

Join Political Pandora! We offer exciting opportunities for passionate youth.

 

Publish your work on a global platform with an engaged audience, often cited in academic research. Your voice matters—be part of the conversation!

bottom of page